Irish Wolfhound Club of Canada Quebec Branch Specialty

Though this post is geared mostly to Irish Wolfhound fanciers, particularly in the Northeast, I think others may find it interesting. Though we have attended this specialty twice before, our attending last weekend's specialty was the first time since I began writing my "Musings Dog Blog" and so this is my first opportunity to comment on this club and the show.  

What I feel is the most memorable and enjoyable aspect of this Quebec Irish Wolfhound specialty club are its members and their hospitality towards guests. To illustrate, the members sponsor a luncheon buffet that is delicious and enormous. Homemade food set out as a huge spread under the tent incorporating fresh salads, hot foods, wraps, fresh turkey and roasted hams, desserts, water & soda and the like. A little something for everyone but the club asks only for a token donation.

We do not frequently see such hospitality in the dog clubs any longer. Friendly, welcoming and generous, these members are proud of their show from beginning to end. They host it on a military college campus in St.Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec along the Richelieu River at the northern end of Lake Champlain. The show site itself is alongside a sports gymnasium on a large, level, grassy area with giant shade trees adjacent to one side of the ring. Parking is limited near the show ring, though, and because it is held on a military campus, the security guards patrolling are usually quite stern if one is parked irregularly. The show officials, especially the show steward, were wonderfully patient and entertaining, organized and quite efficient. It is a small show offering down-home Quebec hospitality and Wolfhound enthusiasts should mark it on their calendar for the future. Keep in mind that they do have an official limit on the number of entries being 175, but this is a smaller specialty in which these figures most likely would not be met. Intriguingly, this club, for several years now, has sponsored an international judge to adjudicate and to be honest, I am amazed as to how they can afford to do so!

My only qualm involving our lovely experience this past weekend is an issue in which I have written about several times previously, and that is the level of unpreparedness of some foreign dog show judges for North American dog show assignments. Meaning, they are not knowledgeable in the American, rather, in this case, the Canadian Kennel Club judging procedures. Officiating was an international judge, Mrs. Csilla Juhash, of Glor Na Gael Kennels in Hungary, who has a lovely personality and was very polite and organized. Moreover, she possessed confident mannerisms throughout her adjudication process. However, we exhibitors and spectators became quite confused during the Best of Breed competition, although; it was clear that the judge most certainly was not. She proceeded confidently in what we assumed was according to the Federal Cynologique Internationale (FCI) judging system, instead of the CKC judging process.

As is typical, the Champion Dog entries, Winners Dog, and Veteran Dog were judged separately from the females. She finished examining all the Champion males but did not re-examine Winner's Dog or Veteran Male, which was her prerogative though she did re-gait them. However, it was here that our puzzlement began. The judge declared her top three best males from the entire line-up announcing them as first, second and third. First place was awarded to a Champion as Best Male; the "second best male" was given to Winners Dog and third place to another Champion dog.

Next, she judged all the Champion Bitches, along with Winners and Veteran Bitch, in the same manner as the dogs and selected, as I recall, two females, the first place being Winners Bitch. Now, all the top five re-entered the ring together where she awarded Winners Bitch as her Best of Breed, which by default was then also Best of Winners. After presenting the ribbon, she then awarded her Best of Opposite of Sex to her previously named Best Male. Next, she gave an Award of Merit to her "second best male" who was also Winners Dog. She then awarded Select Dog to the previously named "third best male" and then awarded Select Bitch to the remaining champion female from the top five. So, she apparently was very comfortable and confident in her procedure, demonstrating that she clearly knew what she was doing. However, for those of us who have never shown in Europe, we were bewildered. It would be entertaining to listen to the replay of the gallery of onlookers and the puzzled pleas and questions as to what was going on, if I only had the foresight to record it on my iPhone.

It think it would be particularly useful if the AKC and CKC provided a simplified handbook for the international judges to study before arriving to complete an assignment in our countries. Though the CKC has a "Handbook-for-Conformation-Judges," as well as AKC has their "Rules, Policies, and Guidelines for Conformation Dog Show Judges," neither are streamlined for the foreign judge, though they both do, in fact, require that judges proceed and award in a specific order. But, neither pointedly detail in one small, quick handbook our judging process from beginning to end.

Though certainly not relevant to this specialty show, the foregoing and current guidelines do not discuss frequently seen errors that repeatedly occur at other specialty shows, such as foreign judges asking exhibitors the age of a dog, or bestowing the Select Award on a class dog. Quite often, many international judges are unaware that Select awards will be disallowed if conferred on a class dog/female who is not a champion of record, to include Veterans class winners. Although, in fact, many foreign judges do not know that a Veteran class winner is indeed eligible for the Select Award. Allowable because some, but not all, Veteran class winners are champions of record. Still, most foreign judges are not aware that they are not permitted to ask if a Veteran is a champion. How's that for a vicious cycle?

Other details that would be very helpful to an unfamiliar judge include suggestions useful in judging large classes. For instance, it is not recommended to make a cut leaving only five dogs, for obvious reasons, and that six or more is appropriate. One of the most common mistakes I witness foreign judges make in our breed, Irish Wolfhounds, is during Best of Breed competition. The judge makes a cut and dismisses one of their Winners and or one or both of their Veteran winners. They should know that it is proper protocol to keep both Winners and, if weather permitting, the pair of Veterans for consideration until the conclusion of their awards. Perhaps I might create a helpful, simplified handbook that clubs can provide to their foreign judges before their assignments to facilitate theirs and the exhibitors experience.

One last note, for Americans traveling to Canada, a solution for the passport quandary is simple. Instead of having to retrieve one's passport from your safety deposit box to cross the border, I suggest that fanciers obtain a Passport Card. The passport card is valid for travel between the United States, Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean and Bermuda and can be used at land border crossings or sea ports-of-entry, but not international travel by air. It is much more convenient and less expensive than a passport book. The size of a drivers license, the passport card can be kept continuously in your wallet in its protective sleeve with your driver's license and is obtained from the U.S. Passports and International Travel agency.

Hopefully, we will see you next year in Quebec as I am sure you will enjoy yourself!